Modern Warfare 3

Yeah, and forget the freedom and love. Just spiders.

Arachnid is great race mate.

Now I wounder how it would be in a hostage situation at the opera house in Oslo.

I don’t know guys, i was reading about the developers at Sledgehammer games and they have developers that worked on Dead Space, as well as Blizzard employees. The creative staff might be better and more motivated to do something better than any previous Infinity ward or Treyarch team. I was expecting this game to be poop, but after reading more about who’s making it, i’m holding my judgement till i see the final product.

After I’ve seen the 3 location trailers, one thing is sure for me : voice acting sucks.

That video did have some shitty voice acting, but it could just be place holding audio, like how soaps voice changed in MW2.

I hope so.

COD=Transformers 2

Look at the single player of COD like your playing Time Crisis, when you have that arcade mentality, it becomes far more enjoyable. It’s not a serious game at all, and i don’t take it that way, thus i’m never disappointed.

I think COD never focused on realism, only teenagers thanked so because of ironsights.

I came to this thread to post almost exactly what you said. O_o

I like CoD games …I know it has become stereotype “go there…shoot…kill…go back…hold the line…” …but I still like them …and I hope MW3 will be as perfect as the previous two games…or even better… :slight_smile:

You’re kidding yourself if you thought MW2 and Blops were perfect, because they were anything but.

Woooowwwwww… Sure, say you like them, but call them perfect??? I can rattle off a billion problems right now;

MW2: over powered tube, infinite tube ammo with one man army, infinite tube ammo with scavenger, lots of hackers, overpriced DLC, host system, hacked servers that gave you 10th prestige hack whether or not you wanted it, short multiplayer, very little after release support of the game; no gameplay tweaking few updates and few glitch fixes, no mods, I could go on

Black Ops: overpriced DLC, servers have to be purchased from games servers, unrewarding killstreaks, stale gameplay, bad graphics, short campaign, stale campaign, no admins on most servers, strict settings for ranked matches, lots and lots of useless attachments and weapons like the weak flamethrower and thermal scope, terrible mapping and spawn point (you get shot in the ass every ten seconds, the maps have god awful flow, all maps don’t feel or play that differently), ridiculously overpowered flashbang (IMO they should have just removed the third gadget slot and put most of that stuff in the second slot), way too few wager match game modes, boring zombies mode, NUMBER OF GLITCHES: IT’S OVER 9000!!!1!!11!1!!! and there’s still more.

I thought MW1 was pretty good.

no matter what “epic novels” you guys will write about ( or rather against ) CoD games…it won´t change my opinion - i like CoD games and yes, I think MW is perfect … :3

Me too, whatever but I still like CoD :stuck_out_tongue:
I agree with those problems but I really like singleplayer of every CoD to date and I like mw1 mp, yeah mw2 and bo have bad mp … but even those are fun from time to time :smiley:

Just like you can’t tell a hardcore Christian that you need a man AND a woman to make a baby.

If you cannot or will not attempt to defend your opinion then you shouldn’t be posting here. Do tell us how MW is perfect.

why? Is that a rule?.. :smiley: I´m not doing anything bad…look, if you don´t like my opinion, just ignore it …voila! problem solved :smiley:

Founded in 2004, Leakfree.org became one of the first online communities dedicated to Valve’s Source engine development. It is more famously known for the formation of Black Mesa: Source under the 'Leakfree Modification Team' handle in September 2004.