Embryonic stem cell research

I don’t understand how you could interpret it that way. That is completely the opposite, Jesus is saying that some of the Deuteronomical and Levitical laws ARE wrong.

God made it simple, he gave them the 10 commandments but to them it wasn’t enough they decided to go against god and make their own rules, 644 to be exact. The only laws that they needed were the 10 commandments but they chose to make it complicated. Jesus came to correct that to accomplish the old covenant and open the door to heaven.

If you want more answers then go find the resources on the website Catholic.com I’m not indulging in anymore of your godless chatter.

“It was because your hearts were hard that Moses wrote you this law”
The most logical interpretation, not the one that best fits you, is
“your hearts were hard”, you were bad, “moses wrote you this law”, you were punished.

Wrong interpretation, Moses gave them what they wanted.

If you want more answers then go find the resources on the website Catholic.com I’m not indulging in anymore of your godless chatter.

Show me by what twisted and biased logic you come to that interpretation.

Also, while reading this, scroll up a little. There is a long post there that says garthbartin next to it. Stop ignoring it.

EDIT:
If you want more answers then go find the resources on the website Catholic.com I’m not indulging in anymore of your godless chatter.

I don’t want answers, I just want you to stop being an ass.

Danielsangeo pretty much ignored the point and meaning of each of those scriptures and went ahead with pushing his opinion in whatever way best suited his interests. Not gonna bother arguing against him and others because, I don’t really need to, and secondly, there is no point. Doing so will probably be like talking to a brick wall.

hahaha, what a wanker.

Actually, I choose not to be, masturbation is a lack of self respect.

Anyway, all the resources are available to you to answer your questions here: https://forums.catholic.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4
There are already over 10,123 questions answered and there are more detailed answers in the “this rock” newsletter articles which are on the website.

Once again, I don’t want answers, I just want to pop your bubble.

So you’re telling me you’re proud to think there’s no point to exist? You should definitely read Summa Theologica by Thomas Aquinas then. Every atheist who really looks into it can’t find any rebuttals to his arguments. But I shouldn’t really expect you to care enough since you’re so obviously complacent or apathetic. Prove me that I’m wrong about you, show me that you care enough about life to do something about it, read Summa theologica.

15 actually

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TAtRCJIqnk&q=18

I don’t know what it is and I don’t want to pay for it. Take a few of your favorite biased lines and post them here, then watch me tear them to pieces.

Also, your logic is religion makes you feel warm and fuzzy, atheism doesn’t (not entirely true). Just because something makes you feel good doesn’t mean it’s right. I don’t like to believe that america’s economy is fucked, does that make it any less true?

That’s why it’s kind of silly using scriptures as argumentation methods in the legal arena. Each person has their own interpretation on what the scriptures mean and any time two interpretations clash, there’s really no point in arguing further because it’s like talking to a brick wall…on both sides.

Best to leave the Bible out of it. :slight_smile:

I choose to be a wanker, masturbation is fun and useful.

@ Joe

Summa Theologica is based on a flawed presupposition: that God must be the universe’s creator. It works internally but is otherwise a worthless circular platitude since no one can prove that God actually did create the universe and that it wasn’t, in fact, sneezed out of the nose of the Great Green Arkleseizure.

When you presuppose characteristics that have not shown to be in evidence, then anything is possible…and the argument is worthless.

I stopped reading after page 6…it got to be pretty pointless. Anyway, we are just another animal. More intelligent, yes-but better-no. A dolphin is (supposedly) more intelligent than a dog. Does that mean the dolphin has a *right over the dog-ABSOLUTELY NOT. They both are animals trying to survive, so are we. We are **equal with them.

*Rights do not exist in nature, what wins, wins. Right now humans are at the top, we are winning.

**There is no equal, I am sorry. I mean that we are both in nature and competiton.

Sorry if any of my point did not get across properly, I will reply to try to help get them across.

The problem is: We might win so much that we lose.

But… god put those in the ground to test our faith!

Good point.

Founded in 2004, Leakfree.org became one of the first online communities dedicated to Valve’s Source engine development. It is more famously known for the formation of Black Mesa: Source under the 'Leakfree Modification Team' handle in September 2004.