Preaching to the choir, pal
My high school science teacher taught us both sides of the arguments for both creationism and evolution, and strongly encouraged us to make our own decision on the matter.
Thatās how you should do it.
^agreed
Thatās how I was taught.
im still hoping someone made that just to troll people on the internet
Knowing my high school bible teacher, I honestly have to say that I can believe it. 
my old religion teacher was a liberal alcoholic crazy cat owner
he died of a stroke this month
I miss those classes
damn, my math teacher was like that too
except he was a depressive motherfucekr with a very short temper
oh, and his kids hated the guy
Hogen, a Chinese Zen teacher, lived alone in a small temple in the country. One day four traveling monks appeared and asked if they might make a fire in his yard to warm themselves.
While they were building the fire, Hogen heard them arguing about subjectivity and objectivity. He joined them and said: āThere is a big stone. Do you consider it to be inside or outside your mind?ā
One of the monks replied: āFrom the Buddhist viewpoint everything is an objectification of mind, so I would say that the stone is inside my mind.ā
āYour head must feel very heavy,ā observed Hogen, āif you are carrying around a stone like that in your mind.ā
^ relevant
I remember my history teacher did the same thing. She taught us that Christopher Columbus sailed across the Atlantic in 1492. And she taught us that Christopher Columbus sailed across the Atlantic in 1942. She then strongly encouraged us to make our own decision in the matter.
Math class, too. Thatās why I know that the sum of the square root of any two sides of an isosceles triangle is the sum of the square of the remaining side. She let us make our own decisions about things.
Thatās how you should do it.
Wut. No one should ādecideā when Columbus sailed across the Atlantic, or how math works. I donāt get it.
Science is about teaching facts and methods etc. Religion in any form (including creationism) should be kept as far away from all that as possible.
If you want to be taught anything religious in school, there should be a separate, optional class for that.
Also, even if it was acceptable to teach both creationism and evolution, and other similar cases, it wouldnāt be acceptable to just simply teach the two subjects side by side. Youād have to have your students do a serious comparison of the two, and present and request arguments for both, etc.
The way you guys are suggesting it āshould be doneā will just resulting in everybody continuing to believe what theyāre most inclined to believe anyway.
Which is exactly what my science teacher did.
In any case, religion is a really difficult subject when it comes to education, because some people believe it to be inherently true, some believe it to be inherently false, and others are in between. How do you approach something of subjective reality in a setting where most things are assumed to be objectively true?
Iām not sure how creationism can be taught in science considering itās not scientific (not falsifiable, not testable, etc) at all.
so what!!!He was gay andļ»æ what??? he has a perfect music!!! I dont know what its annoyed you!!!
Which is why it should only be taught in optional classes.
Read Danielās post again.
Can someone recommend some programs thatāll make charts like this? Iāve been searching for a while and canāt find any.
Lets remember that Evolution is only a theory. Creationism is arguably also a theory, so I do not see what is wrong with teaching the arguments to both.
I always get a kick out of hard headed Creationists and Evolutionists tying their panties into knots over how their particular view has to be 100% fact. Whatever happened, happened. No one can see, smell, hear or touch the past either, so unfortunately for us no one is ever going to āknowā what really happened anyways.
Least ways not on this particular plane of existence anyways 
Look for tournament bracket software like this.
Erm, not really. Theory, where it comes to science, means something that is backed up with scores of evidence; the theory explains the demonstrable facts. Creationism is most definitely NOT a theory where it comes to science. Saying something is āonly a theoryā is simply silly.
The main difference between evolution and creationism is that evolution has infinitely more evidence for it (since creationism has none).
There is as much evidence for evolution as there is for gravity. So there. Evolution is based on fact and observation, creationism is based on peopleās fancies and texts that are thousands of years old, completely different from the original texts, and have been rewritten and reinterpreted thousands of times.
Itās perfectly reasonable to accept evolution as an explanation for the diversity of life, since it agrees with our observations.
Creationism has nothing to offer which we can compare to the world we live in today, since all it does is posit a statement as fact with no supporting arguments or evidence that are based in the real world (i.e. not the bible or someoneās personal relationship with god/jesus).