[indent]God I fucking hate dubstep… I mean, “I like good dubstep”[/indent]so the audience heard and agreed.
…
The lead-singer/songwriter made the comment after tweaking the tuning on his guitar (which, by some chord strum, created an atrocious feedback with electronic interference).
Personally, I have tried to listen to some. Tried. Desperately. Attempted to listen to a multitude of links, even with videos to distract from them… more than enough to compose a full album (after listening to which you’d say “This artist can’t do a single decent song”).
There are glimmers of hope in the genre, in the form of samples. It turns out people who enjoy and produce dubstep can also enjoy music which I find pleasing, so the taste of listeners is not exclusively bad; dubstep’s horror is not commutative. Music that all listeners are inclined to appreciate is what I term “objectively good”.
Portions of objectively good music may be brought into the genre, but I argue that additions and modifications native to dubstep only detract from the source.
If there is any redemption by a piece of music called dubstep, I have observed that the greatness of its sampling outweighs the liberty it took with it. As dubstep’s disgust-per-second is usually higher than the enjoyment-per-second of other music, I argue that preferred songs of dubstep are oft greater-composed of samples from other, better, music genres.
What is your opinion?