I have come to a realization that you can’t compare these two games, as they are of different category. Call of Duty has be come a ‘Unreal Tournament’ like arcade, fast paced first-person shooter(and a bad one at that) and BF3 is a realistic-action like military fps. Although if compared due to facts Battlefield wins, I don’t understand why CoD fans have yet to realize that the game is the same. TBH I think it’s just ignorance, there is a difference between being a dedicated fan and being an arrogant and ignorant pigeon. I could understand a little more if CoD was actually worked on and they tried to improve it, but all they are doing is “Copy, Paste, and Relabel w/ a new skin.” I know what I am talking about, I used to be a CoD fan, I’ve been there since CoD1, 2, 3, 4, and I was even in the CoD 4 beta, I was hooked on the game, and I liked WaW, but any pigeon could see that CoD 4 and MW2 are the same with very few tweaks or improvements. Also, they don’t make betas anymore because they know that it’s the same game as last time, so why release a beta when they could give you a the same glitchy game on day one. I only play it because my brothers and friends play it, so it’s one of the few ways I stay in contact with them. I am very good at CoD so i’m not one of those people who say they don’t like a game because they suck at it. I just want CoD gamers to admit that there are better games out there and that CoD isn’t the only FPS there is, is that too much to ask.
So, please tell me what makes you think CoD is so much better than other FPS’s like Medal of Honor, Battlefield, Halo, Crysis.