You now realize I was talking about human arms that extend off of your torso.
No shit. I’m just saying that thats to weapon, me and all of my closest friends would rape the shit out of any invading force that would step into our town. Creating a militia is also a something that should not be regulated.
I should get a pick up and put, like, twenty uzis on the back of it, on a tripod. That would be a fuckin legit militia.
You know it dood.
The Right to Bear Arms.
^ :awesome:
The right to bare arms.
She shouldn’t wear her hair up like that. It’s ugly.
I was scared when I first saw that image.
Guns shouldn’t be controlled much. I think that convicts/felons shouldn’t be allowed to have a gun, [U]ever[U], and that people need to be 18 or older to have a gun license. Also, only citizens should have gun licenses!
Old threads shouldn’t be controlled much. I think that dead threads shouldn’t be allowed to stay dead [U]ever[U], and that threads need to be 5 months dead or older to be posted in. Also, only Cockroaches should have necro licenses!
Seems contradictory.
Even the U.S. military?
Esp. the U.S. military. JUST KIDDING! Jesus, Texas, put the .38 PS’s and the .357 magnums down.
Seriously though, I think people under 18 shouldn’t have guns, and anyone convicted of a violent crme should definitley not be allowed a gun. Aside from that, whats the point? Clip size is regulated here in Calfornia. If I fire 4 rounds or 24 rounds you’re just as dead. Caliber size? You hit the right place and caliber size doesn’t matter balls. Gun type control makes some sense. having a Glock 19 is one thing, even if you have an extended magazine. An M60 with a picatinny rail’d grenade launcher is something completley different. Although, carrying an M60 will probably have the authorities with their eye on you anyway, so the point of “controlling” such a large weapon is moot.
u gun mad?
The only thing that I don’t get regarding those that call themselves pro-2nd Amendment is that the 2nd Amendment just says “arms”. True, a gun is a type of “arm” but there are other kinds of arms. My question to those that call themselves pro-2nd Amendment is this:
Is there a line where the government should control use of arms? M16s? Uzis? Cannons? Katanas? Fully-functional bat’leths (for the Trekkies/Trekkers)?
How about a small nuclear bomb in the garage? Weaponizable anthrax powder?
They’re all “arms”, right? Can someone illuminate me?
what aboot improvised arms, like a spraycan flamethrower, or a mug of hot tea
personally, pistols, SMG’s, shotguns, assualt rifles and bladed instruments are fine. I draw the line at machinegun nests in the backyard. But that’s just me, there are folks out there who would love to have nukes in the basement…
seriously, wtf
I just fail to see why any non-military person needs anything greater than a hunting rifle anyway. If you say it’s for protection then maybe you should start lobbying for better public safety rather than arming yourselves.