I was lurking, curiosity got the better of me, and my career path/education made it too tempting not to post.
Embryonic stem cells come from an embryo that’s between 50 and 200 cells large. It’s a tiny, tiny dot of little cells that COULD give rise to a human life if they were to begin dividing and building specific cellular systems based on encoded genetic data, but they are harvested before they can.
https://stemcells.nih.gov/info/basics/basics3.asp
(This is from the National Institute of Health, a government organization of the United States that researches and experiments with medicine and human health sciences, as well as directing public health facilities and groups in the treatment of persons both here in the states and abroad. They also back their data with research and information already culminated from both American and International research. In short, it’s not Wikipedia.)
It’s not a human life, it’s a microscopic handful of cells that, when they work together, can create human life. You might as well imprison yourself for the murder of trillions of billions of innocent sperm cells, or the loss of hundreds of thousands of unfertilized ovum. They have the ability to create human life as much as embryonic stem cells. It’s just a matter of having them triggered properly to do so.
Stem cells do not correlate into a living organism, they’re just a mesh of unspecified cells that can rapidly replicate and grow into bigger cellular forms when they’re engaged by natural triggers within their genetic code. They have the POTENTIAL to form life, but they in themselves ARE NOT life.
Stem cells are so important to medicine because of how they act, they can mimic cells to develop tissues and systems on their own. So, if applied correctly, a woman suffering from debilitating heart disease or lung cancer can have new, healthy lung or heart tissue grown from embryonic stem cells. (Much like this rat)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruZvo9zH8Bc
(And yeah, the stem cells were taken from newborn rats, but they’re lab rats used for research dammit.)
Hell, this shouldn’t even be such a big deal anymore, we know how to synthesize these stem cells from a healthy adult, without the whole embryonic thing.
https://stemcells.nih.gov/info/basics/basics4.asp
(and that’s the National Institute of friggin’ health, again.)
Both types of stem cells have their pros and cons, embryonic stem cells generally being a little more complicated to grow and harvest than ones found already within human beings, and both having issues with cell compatibility upon introduction to the body.
People wonder why we can’t cure cancer, people ask why so many have to suffer with Parkinson’s Disease, diabetes, breast cancer, and autism. They do because people are so quick to take “Embryo,” as a word, and being completely ignorant of the biology and technicality of the term’s use, make embryonic stem cells out to be a life wasted. When these cells are just a lump of nothing.
It’s so blindingly obvious, so many people just can’t grasp that embryonic stem cells are cells that haven’t formed into any kind of organism yet, not the ones harvested for human research like we’re talking about. Now if these were older embryos in which the stem cells have began pooling into sections to form organs and limbs, then it’d be debatable. But they’re not, they’re a lump of unused cells. No different from the countless sperm that have died on balled-up tissues or unused eggs in the ovaries.
Honestly, if public schools did a little better to educate with biology and human anatomy and physiology there wouldn’t be such a shitstorm over this issue. If you wanna bitch and moan about lives wasted, why not bitch and moan about abortion? Those are stem cells that HAVE formed living organisms with distinct biological systems. That could be debated. Embryonic stem cells on the other hand… well, seriously?