this looks interesting

https://au.gamespy.com/articles/107/1070543p1.html
Quite sceptical, however if this plays out like they think it will… we may be in for some massive graphical leaps much sooner than we thought.

Going back to those first tech demos of CryEngine 2, and comparing that to the final visual result in Crysis, the final result, while outstanding, is nowhere near as breathtaking as the original reveal trailer, the key difference being lighting because current hardware simply cannot process such great lighting detail, this may change things though.

Article explains nothing =/

Also

Wow he worked on some no name game that isn’t a competitor for top of the line graphics =/

It’ll be interesting to see what this is all about though. Hopefully they get a demo out soon.

What we really need is some ultra-panoramic semi-spherical monitors, for EXTREME VISUAL IMMERSION

=p wow well aren’t you an optimist

I believe they have something like that already, it was basically just 3 curved 1080p LCD’s joined together with no frame between them… it looked… interesting… but not something i would be willing to blow away 8 grand on unless i won the lottery… aside from great cockpit simulation, getting a few consoles in there for some epic split screen matches… visualises
… oh and read up on the ‘hydra’ chip… imagine… if you had as much money as batman, you could buy an imax theatre, have a gaming tower with 10 GPU’s… and have the most epic setup in the history of ever

I don’t know about you guys, but I had no trouble recognising the CGI objects in that film at all.

it does look VERY pretty though. You can’t deny that applied to a less fantastical setting, scenes would look far more believable with lighting detail like that. Regardless of whether it looks real or not, the increase in visual fidelity is something to get excited about. Yes graphics aren’t everything, but it does open up artistic and cinematic potential with the play of lights.

Another reason i’m looking forward to how this turns out is since 3d graphics became the norm, most lighting technologies give a pretty narrow range of how things are lit up, this may easily allow the creation of settings where the light in the scene has a much stronger individual identity, making the impact and impression all the stronger in scenes depicting the real to those depicting the surreal.

Remember back in the days where 2d was commonplace if you saw screens of different games side-by-side it was extremely apparent, that they were very different games. The personality of the scene was different, the world was coloured and painted in a way that (if it was good) seemed very individual, very unique and very special.

Not to say that the case isn’t true of all games these days, Crysis and Killzone 2 are worlds apart, but this technology, if it pulls through, will give so much more control of the way light falls and shapes around objects, to the artists and designers.

For example. Take a look at some of the concept art for Half Life 2 for instance, compare it to the finished product, the lines and shape and overall appearance of things may have translated quite well, but the scene, the picture of the world the scene takes place in, the colour of the sky and the way it strikes objects on the ground… from the painting to the game, due to technological constraints a lot of the feeling of the scene has been lost in translation.

The reason i compared this to 2d games is that in that era, the concept artists could produce the art that went into the game itself in the same way they produced the original concept… through drawing, painting, taking into account the restraints of screen resolution that applied at the time, whatever they put when they touched paint brush to paper… went into the game. And you could study the background of a scene the same way you study a painting.

You cannot expect a game to be shiny gold, you must think everything will be garbage otherwise you’re going to be let down 99% of the time. Don’t get me wrong i get excited for games, but never from a single article :wink:

it’s more about the technology than any specific games. My strategy with not being let down… i simply reserve judgement till i have the game in my hands… i simply decide to not care. till the game comes out =)
then if it’s good it’s good.

i usually get more excited from playing a sampling of a great game i do not yet own than anything else =)… with a couple of exceptions (damn hype machines)

Founded in 2004, Leakfree.org became one of the first online communities dedicated to Valve’s Source engine development. It is more famously known for the formation of Black Mesa: Source under the 'Leakfree Modification Team' handle in September 2004.