Things that get you mad, from history.

#121

Danielsango hasn’t even posted on this page?

#122

Yeah, I was thinking that too. Maybe it was a Freudian slip?

#123

So that actually means she wants him to have sex with her?
I have a minimal understanding of Freudism, and this is pretty much all I hear about it.

#124

It means… Ah, hell with it, yes. Yes. She wants to sleep with him.

#125

what? huh?

#126

I don’t know. It just kind of happened.

#127

Words so easy.

#128
#129

I seem to have lost the right side of my brain. That or I was speaking of Matt. :facepalm at my own stupidity:

Lets all chuckle over my blonde moment shall we?

#130

Wait, you’re not blonde.

#131

I get mad that we lost Finland to the Russians…

#132

There’s more powerful people in hell, than in heaven. Speaking theoretically, of course.

:expressionless:

#133

BECAUSE OF SWEDEN
ಠ_ಠ

Well not really…you did mean the Winter War right?
Thought Finns defended themselves admirably…and yeah the Franco-British probably wouldn’t have been so useful.

Many things annoy me in history, most notably the outcomes of wars and forming of shitworthy borders and a great many broken promises in decolonisation and independence of mandates (Such as African borders drawn with bloody rulers in total disregard to the populace, Partitian of India, Establishment of Israel &/c). Which innevitably sowed the seeds for ever more conflict.

Edit, and how so little could have made so much change.
Also pointless bloodshed such as the First World War, all that trouble to form Yugoslavia only to cause even more death to split the damned thing up less than 75 years later. >_>

#134

That’s the most convoluted passive-aggressive way of insulting someone I think I’ve ever seen

:expressionless:

I’ll “let it up” as soon people stop “debating” by way of insults. As long as the few people with relatives that fought for the Nazis (the only people that won’t drop this, i.e. the only people who think “just following orders” is a defensible argument) keep substituting insults for logic, I’ll keep responding in the considered, restrained way I have been.

Maybe an analogy would get us away from our familial biases? It’s pretty clear-cut that by the logic presented in this discussion, it would be “unfair” to call the Khmer Rouge Communists because they were conscripted and therefore some of them didn’t believe in the ideology. Or, a more contemporary example, it’s unfair to call Taliban “Islamofascists” because many of them are conscripted and may or may not believe in the ideology of an Islamic Caliphate, despite being forced to fight for it’s creation.

#135

Ah another annoying thing, the term “islamofascist”
Honestly now…

And those who judge the past too much without honestly being able to place themselves in such a position >: (. insults

#136

Actually, I was talking about The great northern war.

#137

So I guess in summary matt… in my opinion you are a judgmental snob, and I am a stupid blonde.

:s hrug:

#138

but your hair is red :expressionless:

#139

Hey, at least
imagesscissors-20beats-20paper.jpg

#140

the incompetence of john hinkley jr

Founded in 2004, Leakfree.org became one of the first online communities dedicated to Valve’s Source engine development. It is more famously known for the formation of Black Mesa: Source under the 'Leakfree Modification Team' handle in September 2004.