Comparing homosexuality with blindness or paralysis and so on is inane. Paralysis and blindness and so on are handicapping. Homosexuality is not a disorder. It’s simply a trait.
To me, homosexuality can ONLY be compared with heterosexuality and bisexuality.
I think the biggest danger here is the arbitrary separation between humans and animals. Winged One, you claim that animals lay on their backs in the water looking for fish and wonders how that applies to humans. They look for fish because they need to eat. Humans need to eat.
I didn’t research giraffes too much but I have researched penguins. And most penguins are monogamous like most humans. Given the choice between a male or a female penguin, the homosexual male penguin will choose another homosexual male penguin and bond for life.
Our behavior is SIMILAR to that of other animals…because we are animals ourselves. We’re primates. Mammals. The separation of humans with other animals is unnatural…and ignorant.
You say you can’t compare humans to giraffes because we’re not giraffes? You’re right. But you can’t compare giraffes to penguins because they’re not penguins. And cats are not dogs. And duckbilled platypi are not koalas. And otters are not zebras (I don’t know many zebras that lay on their back looking for fish). So what? They’re all animals. Like human beings.
I’m glad that you aren’t against homosexuality, Winged One, but try to understand that homosexuality is not a negative or debilitating evolutionary trait. It is simply an evolutionary trait that gives them a DIFFERENT (yet still productive and dare I say “crucial”) role in our species than heterosexuals.