Improve The World

#41

All anti-religious people, by definition, are members of the Homo sapiens species. AKA, all humans.

Also, I’ll note that those that are said to “bash Christianity” (i.e., “extremist atheists”) say very little to absolutely nothing about other religions. Could it be that they’re not “anti-religion” at all? Or perhaps it’s certain actions by certain religious people that they take issue with?

I can find you many religious people that want to abolish certain religions, though.

Want me to ‘drop it’? Say “Eliminate extremism in all forms.”

Sound good? :slight_smile:

#42

But not their own.

EDIT: Very well. Eliminate extremism.

let’s all just get the fuck along

#43

Extremism is what pushes civilization forward though. Remove it, the US doesn’t exist, we never see Europe say goodbye to absolutism, and we never see the end of slavery. Extremism is a point of view, not an absolute. To remove it is to remove most of human progress.

No, we’re not going to let you say anything without debate.

#44

^

extremism != idealism

#45

Eliminate time, so we can go anywhere, any time.

#46

Thank you very much! smooches :slight_smile:

#47

Only acting on idealism often is extremism. In each of those cases the movers were extremist. At the time of the American revolution, the concept of a democracy was laughable. Even among the enlightened thinkers proponents were a tiny minority.

#48

Extremism is being fanatical, uncompromising and entirely self-righteous about one’s beliefs.
The acceptance of those beliefs by others has no bearing on whether or not one is an extremist.

#49

No, its just holding beliefs far to the right or left of the political center of the time. It does not necessarily mean acting on them.

#50

I’d like a central bureau capable of adapting written words all across the internet, for the purposes of evolving English into something less cumbersome.

For instance, correcting all instances of than/then confusion…and maybe introducing the word thet so we wouldn’t end up saying stuff like “Did you know that that…” (underlined letter should be replaced)

#51

I think that that kind of repetition is actually grammatically incorrect anyway. If you’re using “that that”, perhaps there’s a different way to phrase it. I think that is the way to do it.

(See what I did there?)

#52

I didn’t know thet that was an option.

#53

i support newspeak
oldspeak ungood 4eva

#54

I find it double plus ungood.

#55

I find redundancy quite good and fine in a language.

#56

Redundancy is double-plus good.
But repetition under different ideas is loco-loco.

You will see thet this is the case. That much is true.

#57

its definitely doubleplusgood and doubleplusungood, all one word DID YOU GUYS EVEN REAAAD THE BOOK

#58

Sorry, I’m a suffix-man myself. Modifier prefixes demand either hyphenation or a space, depending on parse.
Also no… never read it.

#59

5 rapes for u and no dessert

#60

Smoking 10 joints in one day after smoking 10 yesterday and planning to smoke 10 tomorrow is what I call the good kind of repetition.

Founded in 2004, Leakfree.org became one of the first online communities dedicated to Valve’s Source engine development. It is more famously known for the formation of Black Mesa: Source under the 'Leakfree Modification Team' handle in September 2004.