It’s certainly possible, just very impractical. It weighs, and would run out of ammo in less than thirty seconds, unless they changed the rate of fire. Even if they did, you’d still be reloading for a very long time once you run out of ammo.
Reload a minigun?
All you do is take off one ammo box and put on a new one.
aside from that, a gunner would certainly brake his wrists due to tremendous recoil.
Heck, pilots were complaining about rapid decrease in speed when firing this baby on jets.
Mounted only.
Vera, anyone?
Haha, it’s a Bling-Bling P.I.M.P. AK!
Doubt it. Look at the diameter of the barrels.
Funnily enough, diameter is okay, since standard-issue NATO rounds are still 5.56x45mm.
looks smaller than 5.56 to me. Heck, it could be a .22 for all I care.
Ah whatever, the whole concept is ridiculous anyway
LR 300 one of my fav’s
I’ve never gotten the caliber idea with gun design. Seriously, why would 0.03 mm make all the difference? Why can’t the Colt Python carry a .358 or .356 bullet instead of a .357?
For accuracy, you want the bullet to fit the barrel perfectly. Also, the bullet needs to seal the barrel so that the expanding gas from the propellent doesn’t escape around its sides.
I can’t imagine that 0.03 mm would make that much of a difference, though. If it does, then the manufacturing tolerances on munitions must be fairly hardcore :-/
Protip: Bullets have a larger diameter then the gun barrel they are fired from.
ok…where the hell is the m249?:what:
Nothing can beat the good ol’ Winchester
God Bless the Thompson!
And a proof that Deagle CAN look ugly:
The Kriss, ugliest gun in the world.
How is that ugly?
Not in our imaginations, which is where we fire most of these guns. (Need a wavy font for “imaginations”)
cue off-key cartman voice im-mag-in-AAAY-tion!