I… Also… Think you should… Tone down… The… Ellipses…
not to mention the [earth] military doesn’t shoot off flare guns every time they spot the enemy, let alone carry them.
regardless of what he meant, it would have been more logical to use a weapon with a standard rail system, like an M4 with R.I.S. Rail System. None the less Valve chose to make a heavily modified MP5 the standard for a fictional military organization.
It’s no matter, it looks ridiculous IRL, but in HL it looks cool.
and i still like it more 
:hmph:
:retard:
[COLOR=‘Red’]It’s All in the Detail - small suggestions that don’t warrant their own thread
Improper english on the internet?
My god.
On Topic, it’s not changing.
edit: ninja’d by too many pages
what is it with this forum and quoting the same post three or four times in the reply? I swear I see it on every page of every thread. It’s not clever anymore, guys.
You’ve completely and utterly missed my point. I said that the grunts who won’t fire grenades shouldn’t have an M203 attached to their MP5 and grunts who do should. It would require no changes to the view model and the only change to the world model would be the addition of a new bodygroup for the M203. All it would do when you run over a M203-less MP5 would be is you get ammo.
If this were supposed to fire other grenades then Valve would have made them do it. The only reason all grunts have M203s regardless of whether they actually use them or not is clearly down to laziness on Valve’s part and nothing else.
:hmph: i knew someone would do that
that’s kinda what i was saying in my last post
While I agree with this, I doubt it’ll happen. It would make more sense logistically (why attach an expensive piece of equipment to every weapon if only a select few get ammo for it?), and all you would have to do is make sure the player gets one with an M203 on it from the start, but it’s still unlikely to happen.
Every guns have features that you don’t use every time like the ironsight when using a scope or a GL still attach when you run out of grenade. And yes it’s laziness to don’t make every kind of a single weapon because you have other imperatives. Customizing is good for crysis or cod when you lack cool futuristic/alien weapons
It’s something Raminator did once to troll somebody, therefore it is hilarious and shall be imitated by every forum member at all times.
It’s also something GamesRadar did… twice:
https://www.gamesradar.com/f/the-worst-box-art-of-2007/a-20071211165037654003#td2
https://www.gamesradar.com/f/the-worst-box-art-of-2008/a-20081211141414769068
Anyone know if the cone of fire from the HL2 SMG will be in BM? I dislike cone of fire due to the random dispersion of bullets and would prefer the shooting mechanic used in DOD/CS to control recoil, and I haven’t played HL1, too buggy.
for those of you who think the MP5 model sucks, you can always modify the game.
[align=center][/align]
And for those of you who think it’s what the community wants, it’s not, it’s what the developers want.