Not at all what I said. Have you ever seen Men in Black? I love the ending to that movie because it’s entirely possible that we could be marbles being flicked around by huge aliens, not saying we are lol…I’m just saying that we are most likely all wrong and have no idea what we are talking about.
And why is The Big Bang Theory more plausible then superior beings creating us?
plausible is different than supportable.
There is infinite unsupportable possibilities. The only reasonable thing to do is to say that the current evidence supports a theory. When it comes to the beginning of the universe there is a lot we don’t know, but coming up with a random unsupportable belief is ridiculous. Theories will surely evolve as we learn more. How will an unsupportable belief change?
There isn’t enough support for any theories at the moment for me to change my mind, so why should I? What we know about the Big Bang Theory is based very much on other theories, and Georges Lemaître thought this up in 1927, how would he have possibly had the technology or knowledge to understand any of what was going on in space?
This thread makes me laugh. And then quietly sob to myself.
Yes you did, you said it’s better to believe what you want to believe because we don’t know everything.
And the big bang theory is more plausible because it makes less assumptions.
There’s a huge amount of support for big bang theories, based on observation. The original theory is also based on observation, and you’d be stupid to think the big bang theory hasn’t changed immensely since 1927.
Newton’s law of universal gravitation came from the latter 1600s. As we all know, something from so long ago couldn’t be true today. That’s why everything floats now.
nigga is u dumb. the big bang has significant evidence, thats why it’s considered a theory. you can think of an idea before there’s substantial proof for it u knoooooo
Fancy: Are you drunk again?
IM ALWAYS DRUNK
Are you a Physicist by any chance? If you are not or if you didn’t carefully studied the Big Bang Theory then you don’t have enough knowledge to say there is not enough evidence to support it. It is easy for you to say “there isn’t enough support for any theories at the moment for me to change my mind” if you don’t understand such evidence.
^
Just because we don’t know the answer to some question doesn’t mean we should stop looking for it.
Gugamilare makes me want to know whether he is a kind of professor or not.
EDIT: //ADD
And also, bigbang theory has never been beaten. It was support by at least two observations in the history.
One was made by Edwin Hubble who was using telescope watching those galaxies moving away, detecting red shifting of light spectrum of those galaxies.
Another was observed by Wilson and Penzias, who won the 1978 nobel prize. Wilson was roving around his radio telescope and detect some microwave noices, less than 10 K, which were unfortunately found that they are space radiation radiated from the origin of the UNIVERSE, another kind of red shifting.
No, you just don’t know any of it.
So you are saying that you would rather believe in something without any evidence at all rather than believe in something that has evidence you don’t understand?
Also Lamaitre came up up some of the ideas behind the big bang theory. There has been considerable revision since then. It was mostly Hubble that discovered the shifting in galaxies away from us that provided the first real evidence of the big bang.
Doesn’t it say something that a theory was first brought up in 1927 has had evidence to support it growing since then?
Personally I think that starting with a wild baseless belief and waiting for something to pile up enough evidence to make you finally give it up is backwards. It doesn’t make any sense. Unsupportable theories relating to the beginning of creation are in the realm of the infinite, so no matter how much evidence there is against it, there is still more that could be required.
There is no more evidence to support any religious belief for creation than there is for the infinite other unsupportable possible beliefs, which makes them all equally (in)valid.
We need the pope to see this argument. It could convince him.
I never claimed that I knew how life began, but unlike you I have no problem with saying that I don’t know how it began instead of answering every question with ‘a supernatural entity must have done it’, because if you look at our history you will find lots of questions were answered like that. For example, a thunderstorm was believed to have come from thunder gods. Nowadays people would laugh at you if you said that.
Fixed.
Oh ho ho, you so funny! And just because I don’t believe in TBBT doesn’t mean that I’m retarded. By the way, I’m a very loose Christian, I mainly just believe in the ideals that it promotes, most religions actually are very similar at the basics. There are many theories that we believed were correct that are now turning out to be wrong, or being challenged, take String Theory vs the Standard Model for example.
Could you broadly enumerate the ideals you find appealing in Christianity? Perhaps specifically those of creationism? I’d be interested if there’s anything in there that doesn’t apply to universal human morality regardless of religion.
the fact that you don’t believe it does in fact make you retarded, since ignoring all of this evidence right in front of you is to be quite fucking honest, retarded as balls.
Are you just trying to get on my nerves or are you serious? Because I’m getting pretty mad at the amount of flaming I’m getting here where I specifically said that I was hoping this wasn’t going to happen.
@Wark, btw
And Fancy Pants, just shut the fuck up until you’re able to talk without being a dick.