Call Of Duty: Black Ops Trailer released.

Technology and Gaming
#1

Kotaku - First Look at COD7

Call Of Duty Black Ops - World Exclusive Teaser Trailer - Gametrailers.com

I hope they work harder on this one tbh, because it looks nice.

#2

Anything’s better than CoD3.

#3

Should be good, i mean world at war was ok (zombies was great fun and coop was a good addon) so hopefully they just add and improve onto what they had there.

also it’s not WW2 so it’s better already.

#4

From some of the fast shots, you can see rockets in space, a person in space, futuristic weapons, futuristic armour, and people in crysis-looking suits literally flying. Strange.

#5

Hopefully this will be good.

CoD4 -> CoD2 -> CoD1 -> CoD WAW -> CoD 6 -> CoD3

If it is any higher than World At War in my list then I will definitely get it.

#6

Christ, I’m one of around 3 people on this forum who liked World at War a lot, aren’t I?

#7

Don’t get me wrong, I LOVED WaW. The only reason I put it lower than the others is because of the slight glitches in the multiplayer and the grenade spamming on Veteran difficulty. (Heart of the Reich took 4 HOURS! :fffuuu :slight_smile:

#8

Every Call of Duty game has enemies 'nade spamming on Veteran. Heart of the Reich just has a ridiculous amount of enemies to fight. And I don’t play online because I hate 90% of the people that I’m paired with, so I don’t bother.

#9

Only Valve can do that right, and even then only once. If this one does not fail completely, all future ones will.

#10

/thread

#11

IW IMO is better then Treyarch.

Treyarch Games have no humor at all.

#12


Bscly.

#13

They will probably have multiple developers working on the series. So while you may be getting a new cod every year it’s been in development for 2-3. Anyways, I stopped giving a fuck about the cod series awhile ago but it will be interesting to see if this flops or does well.

#14

Not just in your opinion. Which means the franchise is fucked, because Infinity Ward got screwed by Activision and lost all their talent.

#15

Once I saw the AUG in it I was like, “You know this could maybe be good.”
Maybe cause I’m a sucker for games that have the AUG in it. :retard:

#16

Yeah, but only one game should really be worked on a time per franchise, maximizing innovation, although as previously stated, I doubt they are aiming for innovation anymore.

#17

I bet you’ll end up buying it anyway like a good little consumer.

#18

Fix’d

I have never bought a COD game. Ever.

#19

Good point.

#20

I wouldn’t say that Treyarch sucks. While I’ll admit CoD3 was a pretty crappy game, WaW was actually quite good.

Here’s what I’ve noticed about Treyarch’s Call of Duty games - they try new things. CoD3 - They attempted ‘melee events’, context sensitive moments - like setting the fuses on a satchel charge. I think they also tried implementing ragdolls. Also, CoD3 was the first game to have the ability to throw grenades back. I would add that they added controllable vehicles, but I remember CoD2 had two tank levels.

WaW had co-op campaign, dismemberment, yes, Nazi Zombies - although I don’t really consider that an ‘innovation’.

So, while Infinity Ward is more consistent, Treyarch tries new things in their games. They might not always work, but at least they try.

Founded in 2004, Leakfree.org became one of the first online communities dedicated to Valve’s Source engine development. It is more famously known for the formation of Black Mesa: Source under the 'Leakfree Modification Team' handle in September 2004.