Ask a Muslim!

Jesus said: “Simon, You are ROCK and upon this rock I will build my Church and the gates of hell will never prevail against it.” Paul said: “The Church is Christ’s body and we are his members.”

If the Church was made by man it would never have lasted a year let alone 20 centuries. You just need to look at history to see that it takes more than human effort to have the same teachings since the Apostles. That’s why many Jews and Protestants are coming to the Church. It’s impossible for it to be all human and have so many bad things happen and still be here since Jesus commissioning peter as the Bishop over the apostles.

Arab jews coexisted with Palestinians very nicely until the coming of Zionists and you probably know the rest of the story

p.s oh here is a very interesting picture I have just received

yea it’s Arabic but I can translate what it says :

a “fresh-terrorist” wants to join Al-Qaeda and he’s written a CV :

-Name : terrorist
-religion : none
-date of birth and place : anytime in anyplace
-educational qualifies : Major in crime and murder and “no moral” and global terrorism
-skills and experiences : trained for mass murder and to disturb security

p.s and I suggest to move the argue in Christianity issues to “ask a christian thread”

What are you basing this on? It takes more than your word to make it true.

There have been numerous other religions that have lasted longer than the Christian church, and surely it wouldn’t be because of the influence of the Christian/Abrahamic god?

What is your basis for believing that the “Church” hasn’t changed in 2000 years?
And your argument is flawed.

Take buddhism. It’s probably older than Christianity, and it hasn’t changed any more than Christianity has.

To bring it back on topic, sort of, Islam hasn’t really changed either, and it’s about 1500 years old.

You’re full of shit, as ever.

:ninja:

I bet, I absolutely bet that the whole reason people don’t want to believe that is that they still are prone to the prejudice: “Apes are stupid and ugly.”

They don’t want to be distant relatives to something they find stupid and ugly. So they don’t accept that idea. It’s like neglecting to have any relationship with your mongoloid cousin or your mentally retarded aunt.

It’s just embarrassing, so people don’t wanna accept it. That’s the whole point. And boy, this behaviour is so embarrassing for the rest of us humans who are actually able and HUMBLE enough in the face of nature to be able to accept that thought, be it even only in theory. But no - religion teaches people they are the PRIDE of creation, that all nature has brought forth was only made for their own pleasure and convenience. I can barely control the anger that such preposterous arrogance builds up in me.

Alright, so no straight answer for the first one and the second answer is only an assumption with nothing to back it up.
:frowning:

I think the whole " misinterpret" thing is bullshit. Powerful men exploited the faithful. Muslim empires may have been built around Islam, but they were still empires, they may have killed in the name of Allah, but they were still an empire.

the same way the pope tricked Christians into joining the crusades. Since when did catholics give a shit about the Byzantines? All Religions have been exploited by the evil of men. You can’t look at it black and white, that’s how people get killed.

It’s because (and i only speak for the three divine religions) God created man, and we are supposed to be superior to every other species. according to text, we have souls, animals do not. it’s more so an attachment with human superiority than anything else. Also it contradicts creation stories.

lol @ this.

You can’t even answer why you are religious in the first place.

Some muslim you are.

Why is PI equal to 3.14159265…?

I don’t know :smiley:

Because e already took 2.71828.

Recently was talking to an Islamic professor.
When asked about acts of blowing oneself up to kill others he agreed that it was totally wrong and disgusting. Like the airplane ‘underwear bomber’ he agreed was totally wrong. He said there is no justification to do such acts in the Quran, with one exception. Jews. This is no radical, this is a well respected professor.
It shocked me that such a distinguished individual would admit that such acts when done against Jews is permitted.

when he meant Jews, he meant those “Zionists” who did unbelievable horrible against muslims and the whole world

Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombing - Zionists were behind it
mass murder in palatine and Lebanon - Zionists were behind it

and they did something that even the cruelest Person cannot do, they used to kill young Palestinian guys and digest their organs to sell them in black markets and use their skins to heal wounded soldiers

But you would agree that against the Zionists such actions are religiously justified?

let my try to explain, when an enemy invades a Muslim land no matter how far this land is, he is considered an enemy to whole Muslims and we should rush and defend it against it, and no bro it’s a major sin to kill Jewish “children, women, and the old” only the soldiers

Do all muslims deserve to die, because the 9/11 terrorists were muslims?

do you really think Al-Qaeda members are Muslims ?

I suggest you check the picture I posted above and you’ll 100% understand what I mean

Do you really think terrorism is a real threat?

of course and like I said it’s more threat to us than to you

Founded in 2004, Leakfree.org became one of the first online communities dedicated to Valve’s Source engine development. It is more famously known for the formation of Black Mesa: Source under the 'Leakfree Modification Team' handle in September 2004.