Dr. Perky, essentially what you’re doing is creating a false dichotomy. In your explanation, there are only two options: A god with certain characteristics or no god at all.
And that’s where Pascal’s Wager falls apart. What if the REAL god hates blind faith? In the immortal words of Homer J. Simpson, “Suppose we’ve chosen the wrong god. Every time we go to church we’re just making him madder and madder.”
Why assume characteristics for a deity that you know nothing about beyond what someone wrote in a book? How do you know that the REAL god doesn’t want everyone to be atheist? Pascal’s Wager doesn’t work (and it’s a logical fallacy to boot) because it assumes the following: “X or not-X” without taking into account “A”, “B”, “C”, or the near infinite amount of not-Xs.