But then, couldn’t YOU be wrong and not them?
But if he marries said man… By the way: “Attraction” =/= “Lust”
Excuse me, but that’s just not true. At all. You must be “blinded by sin” if you believe that there’s “no room for interpretation differences”. Every single verse that is commonly trotted out has another interpretation that shows, hey, look, it’s not homosexuality they’re talking about at all.
Yes. But if God isn’t calling homosexuality a sin and you’re just misinterpreting things…?
But fortunately, looking at a woman to lust for her isn’t looking at an image of a woman to lust for her. Who would have imagined that internet porn would be the Christian alternative to stealing a discreet glance at a lovely rack at the pub?
I think I’m getting the hang of this theology thing.
you know some things you should be getting by yourself. yes we are born by sin and why it is so? because we have been doing sins through whole our history and accepting this as normal part of life.
they spread ideology of homosexualism being not sin.
what should i question? if she has right or not to kill HUMAN? c’mon,
you know about the thing that sin of fathers goes to son yea? but how is that? as i already said the soul has influence over the body so if you damage your soul your soul automatically damages you body(don’t consider this thing as “revenge”). so i it comes that if father commit a sin this sin damaged soul this soul damaged body and while our genetics are in our body they are damaged as well so if our genetics are damaged as well our sons genetics will be as damaged as ours AN SO SINS OF FATHER GO TO SON!(or daughter)
so my mother used to smoke a lot and she smoked while she was pregnant on my brother as well. and my brother was born so that he could see only 4% with one eye and he was barely saved after 2 operations on eye. so someone said that smoking isn’t sin? someone still believes in that?
i am not a fanatic and i question myself every time i question even what priest says and until i FULLY understand what he/me says i am not sure in it 100% same for bible same for any other not related to religion thing. so please don’t repeat me this thing every time.
One can’t “spread” homosexual ideology.
Once again, there is no evidence of homosexuality being a “sin” listed ANYWHERE in the Bible. From Genesis 1 to Revelation 22, there’s not a single instance of homosexuality being labeled a sin.
fix’d
I really cannot see where you question your beliefs, please give us an example of when you have been told something from Christian scripture/your priest/the Bible etc. where you’ve questioned it, what it was, and what was it that you weren’t 100% sure on? Please, I would love to know.
Because you say you question your beliefs, yet the views that others are expressing to counter some of your opinions are being totally, 100% side-stepped, and this is why people are asking/telling you the same things.
Please answer a question? Why does the sentence “Homosexuality is normal” offend you? When have you ever questioned your views? Where in the Bible does it say being Gay = Going to Hell?
please re-read what i wrote about humans and ad homosexuality and you will get.
can and they are doing very well.
and about questioning. every human makes mistake and i have seen thousand times what being over too sure brings to man so question yourself if you are right.
How does one spread “homosexual ideology”? Considering homosexuality is found throughout nature, it cannot be considered “unnatural”. As for “normal”, that depends on your basis for comparison. If you’re the straight in a room full of gays, you’re the abnormal one of that group. Everyone is normal. Everyone is abnormal. Left handedness is not normal, is it? Is it a “defect” that must be “cured”? Or am I “spreading left handedness ideology”?
the thing that homosexuality is spread through nature doesn’t mean that it is good. vulcans, earthquakes, tsunamis and other such disasters are “spread” in nature and it is quite a norm but is it good?
I god exists how can science exist 0_0
I didn’t say “spread” through nature. I said “exists”. Left-handedness exists in nature. Is that bad? It’s certainly not “normal”.
Tell me, why do you think homosexuality is bad?
I am not a Christian but I’ll answer anyway. It’s possible for a god to do all his/her work through science. Science and religion are not incompatible.
Exactly, so why are there christians who seem to believe science is bad and doesn’t exist? It’s like they don’t know their own religion.
I’ll answer your question with an excerpt of the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. Some context, first. On some planet (I’ll leave you to read to figure which one), a computer is constructed to figure out the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe, everything. After the two programmers, Fook and Lunkwill, set the computer, known as “Deep Thought” in motion, processing the request, they are interrupted by two irate philosophers. Here’s what happens:
[FONT=‘Times New Roman’]“Come on,” shouted the older one, “you can’t keep us out!” He pushed a junior programmer back through the door.
“We demand that you can’t keep us out!” bawled the younger one, though he was now firmly inside the room and no further attempts were being made to stop him.
“Who are you?” said Lunkwill, rising angrily from his seat. “What do you want?”
“I am Majikthise!” announced the older one.
“And I demand that I am Vroomfondel!” shouted the younger one.
Majikthise turned on Vroomfondel. “It’s alright,” he explained angrily, “you don’t need to demand that.”
“Alright!” bawled Vroomfondel banging on an nearby desk. “I am Vroomfondel, and that is not a demand, that is a solid fact! What we demand is solid facts!”
“No we don’t!” exclaimed Majikthise in irritation. “That is precisely what we don’t demand!”
Scarcely pausing for breath, Vroomfondel shouted, “We don’t demand solid facts! What we demand is a total absence of solid facts. I demand that I may or may not be Vroomfondel!”
“But who the devil are you?” exclaimed an outraged Fook.
“We,” said Majikthise, “are Philosophers.”
“Though we may not be,” said Vroomfondel waving a warning finger at the programmers.
“Yes we are,” insisted Majikthise. “We are quite definitely here as representatives of the Amalgamated Union of Philosophers, Sages, Luminaries and Other Thinking Persons, and we want this machine off, and we want it off now!”
“What’s the problem?” said Lunkwill.
“I’ll tell you what the problem is mate,” said Majikthise, “demarcation, that’s the problem!”
“We demand,” yelled Vroomfondel, “that demarcation may or may not be the problem!”
“You just let the machines get on with the adding up,” warned Majikthise, “and we’ll take care of the eternal verities thank you very much. You want to check your legal position you do mate. Under law the Quest for Ultimate Truth is quite clearly the inalienable prerogative of your working thinkers. Any bloody machine goes and actually finds it and we’re straight out of a job aren’t we? I mean what’s the use of our sitting up half the night arguing that there may or may not be a God if this machine only goes and gives us his bleeding phone number the next morning?”
“That’s right!” shouted Vroomfondel, “we demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!”[/FONT]
They feel that, with science apparently explaining everything, “God” might be shown to be false. They believe that adherence to “Sciencism” takes away the “glory of the Lord” and “replaces it with Sciencism”. You’ll note that a lot of them capitalize the “S” to try to make it into a religion (such as “Well, you can believe in Science if you want”) and then try to point to what they believe to be “wrongs” or “hoaxes” in Science to invalidate it so that people will give up the pursuit of truth and return to the pursuit of Truth.
That’s what I get out of it, anyway.
there is reason for science to be against religion but for today science is much needed. the reason why christians refused to accept science is the fact that god knows everything and if god knows everything than why should we explore something when it is already explored? isn’t it better to try getting closer to god and asking him? but since few humans try this way science is the only way left. btw science cant explain everything.
because it is NOT needed. and left handed or right handed doesn’t make much difference
You should question your anger of the girls who have abortions, that is not even near Christianity.
That means the consequences of the sin goes to the sinner’s children, not the sin itself.
You might damage your children by doing good things as well, like if you go to another country where health conditions are poor to do some missionary work. That is a matter of health, not sin.
When one says the sins of the father goes to the son, I call that culture, and that includes bad Christianity.
Left handed is not needed as well and homosexuality also doesn’t make much difference O_o (I have said this before)
No because God doesn’t exist and trying to get closer to him is a waste of time and effort
Science cannot explain everything no, it can at least try though whereas religion it is “GOD DID IT” which is like saying cars run on magic
Homosexuality is not needed? No it isn;t but it is a decision that someone wishes to take. You being a homophobe is not needed but you choose to do it anyway. Surely this god of yours would rather people are happy than conforming to the beliefs of the almighty imaginary friend?
I agree with that point of view. To me, they don’t seem interested in finding out the truth. Instead, they grab their beliefs, tell themselves that that is the truth and close themselves to everything else. They call that faith, but that is actually fear of the truth.
being angry when someone kills child is wrong?
that is meant in it.
and smoking was damaging health, slow suicide, and suicide is sin.
I explained that well enough. why sin goes to child
with which hand you masturbate that matters not but whose ass you fuck that does.
of course my lord.
i am not homophobe i am homohater.
Assassin, when are you going to start actually answering questions and discussing these matters, instead of blindly spouting out your own beliefs?
WHY?
You keep dodging this question and it’s a simple ONE WORD question so there shouldn’t be any confusion.
(Also, “fucking in the ass” does not make one a homosexual. Just sayin’.)[/SIZE]
A distinction without a difference.
-phobe: one that fears or is averse to a specified thing
averse: having a strong feeling of opposition, antipathy, repugnance, etc.; opposed
yeah, you should have a real reason instead of just saying “because i hate them” all the time.
EDIT: @Assassin, obviously.
Founded in 2004, Leakfree.org became one of the first online communities dedicated to Valve’s Source engine development. It is more famously known for the formation of Black Mesa: Source under the 'Leakfree Modification Team' handle in September 2004.