You can’t make someone believe in something just for his wish. You can’t choose to believe in something, either the arguments convince you or they don’t.
Of course I could fool everyone and pretend that I believe, but that is painful, pointless and wrong.
That is not hard to do. It is actually simple to consider what the person is saying for what the one is saying, not for who one is or what one believes.
Here is the proof that even Christians can do that.
If you say I’m a hypocrite because I don’t value your opinion, well, that is because your opinion don’t sound reasonable to me. However, I value the opinions of the priest Fabio de Mello and the pastor Rob Bell (which doesn’t mean I agree with everything they say). Also, the Christian that talks in the video above seems to be a very reasonable person as well.
One more proof of bias.
As I said above, I don’t think that “people who believe in god are blind idiots”. There are people (like you) that I consider to be blind, but that is not because they believe in some god. Fancy Pants is an example of someone who is atheist and that I consider to be blind.
All the proof that you might have that I don’t want to find the proof is that I disagree with you, as if you were the holder of the truth. Like I said, I don’t believe in what you say, that is all.
Finally, I did not request a 1000 word post from you, you were the one to request us to provide the whole context of the verses we quoted, which means, at least, the entire book (not the bible, just the book) we are quoting from. I just asked for you to show how one can do that.
I don’t understand what you are trying to say here. Can you give examples?
I know you disagree with his argument, but you disagree with it because of what he is trying to prove, and not because his argument is not consistent. I’m talking about the reason of disagreement.