Not exactly a vaccum, more like an invisible fan on the opposite side… 
You try making an uber-realistic vaccum in source without Scripted Sequences.
Beautiful. What kind of camera are you using?
So how long have you used blender?
I learned how to model with Blender in 2008 I think, I haven’t used it much since then. I have no clue how rigging and animation works in it. This character will be the first complete project I’ve done with Blender since I learned it.
Most photos are taken on a Canon 1D Mark II N, some on a Canon 1Ds, might even have used the 20D for a few of those.
I wish I could have more money, I’ve always wanted to take such photos.
That’s nice for a first map!
Being a good photographer isn’t about WHAT you’re using, it’s HOW you’re using it . So it doesn’t really matter what kind of equpiment you have, as long as it has manual settings -> you can do something cool with it…
The camera itself has nothing to do with the composition of the shot, that is all you. I have seen shots taken on a disposable camera that blow me away, and I’ve seen shots taken on a digital medium format camera (that cost more than my Mercedes did) which were very ‘bleh’. If you have a good eye, you can make almost anything work.
If you want to pick up a camera but you can’t afford much, old film cameras are dirt cheap these days. I’ve seen a used Canon Rebel series cameras selling for under $50 with a lens…though you will have to pay for film and developing. If you want to go digital, you can probably look for a used Canon digital rebel (300D), rebel xt (350D), 20D, or 30D, and pick one of those up for $200-300 with a lens. I forget much of Nikon’s lineup, but the D50 is still a capable camera as well, and is also dirt cheap. Some advanced point and shoots with full manual controls are nice too, but I’d suggest a real SLR if you’re interested in expanding your skills, as you can change lenses, allowing you yo do things a P&S will never be able to do. If the SLR doesn’t come with a lens, you can buy new and used lenses, such as the 18-55 most SLRs come with, or a 50mm f/1.8, for under $100 usually.
Agreed, for the most part. A good camera and good glass in the hands of a skilled photographer will allow that photographer to do things that a lesser camera and cheaper glass might not allow. Cheap glass can absolutely limit you, forcing you to use a flash, lug around a tripod, and not give you much control over depth of field, when compared to better glass. Also, if you only own say an 18-55mm lens and cannot get any closer to a distant subject, then you likely cannot get the shot you’d like, while someone with a 300mm lens might be able to frame the shot exactly how they would like. That same 300mm lens might still not be long enough for other shots, like wildlife or sports. However, for most people, a wide zoom (18-55mm f/3.5-5.6), a telephoto zoom (75-300mm f/4-5.6), and a fast prime (35mm f/2 or 50mm f/1.8) should cover most needs for many years. Once you discover the limitations of your gear, then and only then should you need to buy better gear.
For an amateur? Now that’s just being picky…
erly charger i made tonigt cos i whent to the dentist and it hurts nao
im going to sleep nao , ill work on it tomorow
I miss Zbrush, gotta take some good lessons for it
In b4 uncanny valley… oh wai…
at least she doesn’t look like a tranny anymore
Chotolarg we’re going to have a competition - you use your $800 Zbrush software which you paid for, and I’ll use my free open-source Blender app, and we’ll see who is victorious :evil:
yea… paid…
Sensitive topic is sensitive:aah:
early charger is early
yea so i “”"“paid”"""" for maya to ,
Yo waht. :3