Thank you?
I lol’d
Media heavily influences people and the rich love buttfucking the poor. However the nonsense mr. foreigner has been spouting is a ridiculous exaggeration.
He is. Unless you ignore statistics and what’s happening around you.
Like Jeannotvb has any real experience with the United States. He’s still convinced that everyone to the left of him is diabetic
You’re more of a sheep falling into that bullshit “lol evry leeder es corrupt” stuff.
meh. politics. never understood this stuff. too many opinions and people who don’t realize that all they really are are opinions. this thread = uninteresting. well, almost completely or I wouldn’t have clicked on it.
…this is what governments are for. Do you think you’d be happier without a government? Because I don’t think you would be.
Oh no you found out the secret of the U.S. electoral system, we’re all just pawns of the news stations and vote for who they want! Oh wait that’s right we don’t, we come up with our own ideas and vote for who we want. :meh:
Based on your statement I have concluded that you may be:
A. A liberal
B. A Democrat
C. Gay
D. A foreigner that is basing his/her facts on Obama-owned media centers
E. An illegal mexican
F. Some other shit that Obama has a heavy influence on.
Check your statistics. We are further in debt. Obama’s approval ratings are on an all time low. Gas prices have lowered, however, he said that the prices will be equal to that of a few euros. Now, most Americans can’t translate currency, but a few euros would be equal to that of around 4-8 dollars in USD. His health care plan has failed miserably. Cash for clunckers didn’t help worth a shit. He is considering abandoning Isreal and revoking he 2nd Amendment (probably won’t happen but the thought counts). Feel free to correct me on anything I may have miscalculated or gotten wrong. I hate arguing politics so alos feel free to not respond at all and get back on subject about lulzsec and their objective of hacking the governments and agencies.
Revoking second amendment rights? Now that’s just downright bullshit. No politician would ever touch that subject with a ten foot pole. You’re clearly just a dumbass listening to Republican propaganda. Also, modifying/revoking the Second Amendment would be a damn good thing. The second amendment was vaguely worded and written in a time with 30 seconds+ per shot muskets, now we have semi auto pistols and automatic rifles and shotguns and more. Why am I not surprised that Gabriel Giffords was shot in a state with very lax gun laws? Also, in the time it was written, fire arms were a necessary part of life. Hunting was a huge source of meat. There were attacking Indian tribes. Citizens were called upon by the government to quell rebellions and such with their own weapons. Guns were NEEDED. Now they’re just for rednecks to play with and nutjobs to kill with.
Let me guess, you also think Obama is a Communist and a Socialist? Don’t get me wrong, I don’t like Obama either. But I don’t like him because he’s practically a Republican; from the very start he’s compromised to the Republicans with his tail between his legs like a little bitch. This situation works out perfectly for Republicans; they can get whatever they want and label it “compromise” and “bipartisanship” and then when their agendas and “compromises” continue to fuck up the economy they can claim it’s because of Obama’s nearly non existent liberal and “communist” and “socialist” values.
Oh look, it’s the blind arguing with the blind.
Garth, you cite one news network as proof that there’s not a liberal bias? Good luck with that.
It was just an example. Not a citation or a proof. lrn2read.
I’m not any of those, actually.
Your post is full of racism and hate for ideas, and you say you “hate arguing politics”? Well thank god- you suck at it. Yet, you posted this, so I guess that was a lie anyway.
Obama was not in charge of cash for clunkers, did not propose it, and frankly I don’t see why you brought it up. Entire Israel thing is kind of random too, and the second amendment thing is bullshit as well. [wikipedia and google man, don’t even have to be selective with your search terms]
On the Second Amendment, Barack Obama said, “There is an individual right to bear arms, but it is subject to common-sense regulation, just like most of our rights are subject to common-sense regulation.” His gun control focused on sport, and not so much on changing the right to bear arms from a self defense stance.
Honestly I’d like to criticize your argument, but it’s not an argument. You’ve pulled random tidbits of “bad” from who knows where. Your “views” seem to be a bunch of random conclusions derived from the culture surrounding you, wherever the hell hole may be, but I can tell it’s not a point of view you’ve acquired through logical, prudent thought.
A good thing, huh? Are YOU a fucking moron? Think about the consequences of that you dumbfuck! It would be a damn ball for the arms dealers! IF a regular citizen couldn’t own a gun then they have nothing to defend in case of a gang or robbers or some other shit.
All the complete fucking assholes would have guns! Murder rates would rise. As well as crime in general. If Obama ever revoked the 2nd ammendment it would spell out hell for this country in more than one way.Its simple. The people with guns would overrun the people without guns. The police wouldn’t be able to do much and the military would only make problems worse! Guns offer a sense and means of rotection, security, and control. The regular citizens wouldn’t want to get in trouble while the criminals wouldn’t give a damn. This whole post is completely disorganized!
Tell ya what. Anyone who wants my guns can have them…one fucking bullet at a time.
Who gives a fuck if there’s a liberal bias in the news? If you’re skeptical about a news report, google it to find more information, or listen to a news organization with a conservative bias who will report it the way you want to hear it.
Dumb conservatives have the Wall Street Journal and FOX, dumb liberals have MSNBC and the Huffington Post, and smart people have a network of journalists whom they trust and can use to cross-reference conflicting reports. Everybody wins.
I’ll now assume you are a troll, because to assume otherwise would lead me to lose all faith in humanity.
I’m guessing this retort was at garth, because it doesn’t make an iota of sense when looked at with context considered.
I wasn’t saying it’s a bad thing necessarily, I’m just saying it exists, and only an idiot would try to argue that it doesn’t. Anybody who gets there news from one source is, like you said, dumb. People should seek their own opinions and not listen to what pundits from either side say.