But still: She might live long enough for witnessing the boy gain consiousness.
And regardless: It’s still fucking ridiculous: Someone who makes love with his grandmother is messed up.
Do you know why the cheetah is still alive today and why it’s the weakest of the big cats?
During the last big ice age, they resorted to inbreeding in order to keep the species alive. more than half the cheetag population still alive today has genetic defects, be it crooked bones, shorter tales, abnormal amount of teeth, bad sight, bad hearing, bad heart, whatever.
Point being: it’s a pretty natural thing for related animals to mate with each other if there isn’t another option. And if you remember my rant about the term “love” a few days ago, the same rule can be applied her. Religion/culture has dictated us that mating with relatives is a big no-no, so the restriction is purely cultural, not natural.
Natural or not: It’s messed up, regardless of what happens in nature.
Only because you grew up in a culture that told you such an act is messed up, though.
Yeah. In Japan, for instance, child rape is funneh!
In Japan, any type of physical and/or mental abuse is hilarious.
so are you implying the mating with your sister\mother\grandmother etc is justified ?
Yes, the Cheetah inbred to survive, animals don’t tend to inbreed because the offspring have a high chance of having a genetic defect and so through evolution and natural selection animals including humans have become repulsed by the idea of inbreeding.
The cultural reasons have probably been built around the natural feeling of love for relations (in a non-sexual way) and not wanting to have sex with your grandmother.
So it’s unnatural to inbreed unless there is a population crisis, and in fact some animals have a variety of behaviors which will eliminate or severely restrict inbreeding like in wolves where only the alpha pair will breed.
Unless you’re facebook: https://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=50578
Well, according to nature’s laws, depending on the situation: yes. According to cultural laws, depending on where it happens: no.
Apparently, but hey! It’s BOLTEH!!!1!1!!!11! Always disagrees with the majority.
EDIT: Aimed at Shadi
No, according to nature’s laws: No because of the genetic defect passed on.
Even by cultural standards, I’m sure people would think it remotely acceptable to inbreed if there was no other way to keep the continued survival of the species.
So you agree, inbreed is justified if the situation asks for it.
Besides, any reproduction passes on genetic defects, inbreed just seems to magnify those defects.
Products of incestuous union have a high chance of being mentally retarded, for example, but that doesn’t mean that al retards are a product of inbreed.
Except in case of humans, since we’re kinda overpopulated. So, in this case it’s not really justified.
wut ?
indeed, even if was done for survival it will lead the off spring from bad to worse and worse through time
Well yes, but that still doesn’t change the fact that inbreed is perfectly natural.
Well yes, I think it is justified only when there is no other choice.
But it is definitely not natural or justifiable in any other circumstances, especially when there are over 6 billion members of the species and to be honest it sounds as though their genes shouldn’t be passed on as it is let alone with a defect.
Wait, so you guys haven’t fucked your grandmas?
Psyborg - whatever you are trying to accomplish with your recent postings - I have a strong feeling that you are trying way too hard.
The force is strong with this one.
something has changed?