Fuck you too, man. 
It doesn’t matter who you were aiming at, your inability to be pleased and consequent graphics-whoring irritates me.
This is something that stems from reading gametrailers.com comments on game reviews. A game will look utterly phenomenal and they’ll snobbishly say “The graphics are, unfortunately, fairly lack-luster” and mark a great game down for it. And then the comments will be flooded with headless chickens saying ‘LOLOL TEH GRAPHIX ARE SO SHITTY’ and I die a little inside.
Watch the trailer again, this time in HD.
The graphics looks great! And best of all, there’s COLOR! Something that’s been missing in most games today!
The SPARTAN armor actually looks like it’s made of metal! Not some shiny plastic stuff!
Edit: Though I have to admit, the guy doing the voice over in the video is kind of a douche…
This game will blow. Look at those shitty graphics. I don’t care about story or gameplay…fuck those. Everyone plays games for graphics. Bungie has forgotten this.
Yeah, and you sucked Raminator’s dick.
And all you got was that stupid title. :lol:
I KNOW!!!
Fuck! Halo isn’t even STRIVING for photo realism!
It’s got it’s own fucking style. It shows in the color palette, the way lines are spoken, the storyline, the weapons, the sound design, even the MOVEMENT OF THE FUCKING CHARACTERS.
Halo doesn’t WANT to be realistic.
Also, the graphics are fucking great! I know for a fact that this guy doesn’t know shit about the subject, but oh well.
1: The models are possibly the most detailed in any console game, and actually rivals PC models (even though this is ultimately up the artist)
Want to argue? Look at the fucking elite’s teeth. Not only are they individually modelled (not a transparency like most people would do) but they’re SMOOTH. There’s enough polies in the fucking TEETH to make them look smooth! THAT’ FUCKING UNHEARD OF. and there are a lot of teeth.
The poly count of the models are insane. As is texture size.
The sky system is something no one’s ever done before. There’s no sky box (even crysis still had the blue shll). All clouds are actual particles, and the stars are too. The planets in the distance are objects (probably sprites, but who cares?) and it looks FUCKING AMAZING.
Plus there are plenty of things they have yet to add. It’s going to have ambient occlusion, but it’s been tn out of the beta due to stability issues. I will be in the final game.
I believe there’s parallax occlusion mapping. The treads on the warthog tires make me suspect this. doesn’t look like regular PM.
They ALEADY have better looking builds than the beta they’ve been showing so far. They’ve already shown them actually. It will probably get better.
It does look like halo’s finally doing something vaguely different with the multiplayer, but in any case, since its Halo, I am obliged to meh it until otherwise proven.
BTW, there is always a sky box, otherwise there would be no background to the sky. Not having one just makes it black and boring. (Or exposes the Void.)
Eh… No.
Not with fog. It will eventually become dense enough in the horizon to color the sky.
Wait… I don’t think you understood what I said. The sky is simulated, therefore there is no skybox. Yes it’s a rudimentary simulation, but it’s better than a fucking sphere… Or worse yet, a cube coughcallofdufycough
When a ship flies in from above the planet’s orbit, you’ll get what I’m talking about.
Okay, I see what you’re saying. I’m just saying that ultimately all a sky box is is a covering of the map with a texture, and things like stars can be included in that texture without hurting realism. Ultimately all this seems kinda gimmicky. Especially the stars.
Gametype specific Loadouts (each one will be changed to best suite the gametype for gameplay balance, so that there will be no “best class” like in MW2)
New modes (with Invasion sounding like the coolest one)
Armor Abilities (Jet Packs and Armor Lock FTW)
Unique Elite (the aliens that don’t suck ass) player traits
Not to mention, new weapons*, and the epic return of an old favorite
Yep. Only slight changes here. It may as well be a remake with a few new gimmicks. This is such a cheap cash-in milk job.
:rolleyes:
*Warning: Excessive amounts of cheesy “o lol imma so cool and hip” douchebaggery[/SIZE]
You will be proven wrong on Monday. Enjoy your “meh” while you still can.
How the fuck can a method for making skies be a gimmik?
How is a method for doing ANYTHING a gimmik?
Besides, have you seen the skies in motion? They’re fucking gorgous.
Also… The more I think on it… The less of a shit I give about Crysis 2.
Where’s the appeal in the game besides being able to sneak around a restrictive (it’s CALLED open world, but it’s not) map shooting up full retarded enemies?
The graphics is the only leg the game has to stand on.
That and being amazingly fun, but that is a debate for another thread.
All I’m saying is that the sky looks good, but its nothing that couldn’t be done with a skybox and a system that can do what can be done easier is as such a gimmick.
Guys. If it looks good and runs well, who the fuck cares what they did to make it?
You keep calling Crysis a “great game”, yet call Halo “mediocre” and “generic.”
Hell, you even said Crysis was “amazingly fun.”
I hope you realize how ironic that sounds.
What the hell did Crysis do to gain the amount of hype it did? And don’t try to turn this around on me by asking “What did Halo do for the same?” Because THAT’S MY POINT!
Crysis is a PC fanboy’s Halo. The difference is that I believe that Halo is more fun than Crysis (not to mention, you don’t need to sell an arm and a leg to run the game.)
At least Halo (on higher difficulties, my favorite one being Heroic) has good AI.
I want you to sit down, the next few sentences are going to shock you:
People have different opinions of games. I found Crysis massively more fun than Halo. You did not. Neither of us will change this. Lets move on. [color=black]MGS4 had long cutscenes, BTW
It’s not possible.
There’s just no concievable way Crysis is a fun game. There’s nothing entertaining about it except that it’s pretty.
Hey, you were the one that started bitching about it. 
Edit: What makes Crysis 2 more than “vaguely different” from Crysis 1 anyway?
Okay, well, I know that the setting is now a city and not a tropical island.
I also know that the nanosuite has been streamlined to two different gameplay types (stealth or action.) But to what extent? Since playing either way was already possible in the first game…
And you’re an idiot.
ITT: Winged Faggot successfully trolls JohnFaggot. Amazing.
MGS4 sucked nigger penis, by the way. Awkward story, lots of plotholes, below average script, bad soundtrack (where’s Norihiko Hibino?), does not even feels like a proper MGS, Kojima needs a break and I guess PW will suck as well.
Also Crysis warhead is awesome.
@OldDirtyFaggot:
I agree that it isn’t Kojima’s best work, but I think Kojima will do a better job with Peace Walker.
Also, I thought I was quite calm when Winged One “trolled” me with his graphics bitching. If anything, he successfully trolled Ibanez.
“Metal Sucks Geers is the warst series of all tajm, onleh retardz pley itz lolololol”
/sarcasm off.
No but srsly, MGS4 is the best game ever imo :awesome: