So you are saying that it is better if they didn’t make it better?
Ah. Yes, the gameplay could use some improvement to keep it fresh. I mean, just because I played Fallout 3 for 100 hours doesn’t mean I’ll play the same thing 100 hours more (or maybe I will. 
)
:yawn:
How do those guys move those giant power armor suits? Its kinda ridiculous. Also, no gameplay=useless. That applies to New Vegas as well.
It’s a video game.
It at least shows that the game is in production and will be out this year. What you said would be understandable if it was the 2007 Duke Nukem Forever trailer, this game actually EXISTS!
Why not tell us a game is in production by showing us some gameplay?
They released an article about it with screenshots. What more do you want?
A gameplay video. I thought that was clear.
Well you’re not getting it now. Suck it up.
Well its not like I actually care about war hammer 40K, and we know what Fallout 4 will be like, but it would be nice for some other games I care about.
This isn’t Fallout 4. New Vegas is a spin-off that has similar gameplay mechanics to Fallout 3.
You know what I mean. New Vegas has an extra capital in there, and it is thus easier to type Fallout 4. Plus it ultimately is, in the same way we are ultimately on GTA 7.
By that logic, Fallout: Tactics would have been Fallout 3, the console game “Brotherhood of Steel” would have been Fallout 4 and Fallout 3 would have been Fallout 5. New Vegas would be Fallout 6.
:sick:
That shouldn’t even be considered a Fallout game!
A correction. We are actually on GTA 11 or so.
Actually, according to wikipedia, we’re on GTA14 with “Chinatown Wars” (if you count the Episodes as seperate games from IV/11.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Theft_Auto_(video_game)
Scroll down until you see a box that says “Grand Theft Auto series
fictional chronology.”
I said GOOD DAY, sir!
Save that for latter. I could come in handy. 