huh, they are saying the images were shopped and the missile-looking video was real. I guess that’s one explanation for why the two objects look totally different. I’d like to read about how they came to the conclusion the pictures were shopped, though.
They could tell from some of the pixels and having seen quite a few shops in their time.
The very bright-looking object in the sky doesn’t ever seem to actually illuminate any objects in the scenery. Strange since it appears so bright as to cause lens flare.
Mattemuse, I don’t know if you are being ironic, but you can’t prove that the UFO is in fact an alien spacecraft if that is your intention. The chances of it being an alien craft are slim beyond compare, and reaching this galaxy from the closest neighbouring one is a feat not to be taken lightly.
No one said it was an alien aircraft. Most of the explanations given in this thread seem to be incorrect though.
Fnoigy: weather radar is a specialized type of radar, I’m pretty sure they wouldn’t use that at an airport (didn’t read beyond the first couple of sentences though)
dude did you read any of my posts in this thread? My guess (based on the probably fake photos) was a military UAV gone haywire.
that’s assuming that alien crafts use conventional methods of space propulsion for interstellar travel, which is not what is theorized. the theory is that their technology utilizes wormholes and can travel along different dimensions of space-time. There is also a belief that they have many bases set up on Earth, as some people have witnessed UFOs flying into canyons or being sighted frequently around the same areas over the years (such as cattle mutilation sites), while many abductees have memories of being taken underground
It’s a snipe.
I’m still looking for that snipe
In other words: bullshit conspiracy theories from desperate attention seekers who spew scientific words from their favorite sci-fi books/unproved wild scientific theories to sound authentic.
First of all, it never showed up on radar, (most video descriptions mention it not showing up on radar) second of all, the photos and the video are of two different things, the photos are just a time lapse of an airplane (just like timelapse pics of cities where the cars form long ass light trails) and the video is a missile or it could be iron man
and also, marsh gas, and the light from venus reflecting off the upper atmosphere… plus there was a high-altitude flock of birds also reflecting sunlight… and a weather balloon. nothing to see here, folks.
That is an excellent UFO. In fact, it is the finest UFO I have ever laid eyes upon! How much is it going for?
I saw yesterday half of a documentary in Discovery Channel. One of the guys that work for the channel decided to release some balloons, they were tied together but they moved more or less freely so, at a distance, it looked like an object that was constantly changing its shape. The balloons ended up on Youtube with some funny comments like “Wow, these aliens have an incredible technology!”
There was also a light seen somewhere in Mexico that turned out to be a short-circuit caused by a tree with a high-voltage line. It surprises me when people see some lights and already assume it is an UFO, come on, it could be anything: a plane, a helicopter, a natural sky phenomena (electrical or something), a remote-control toy of any sort or even someone trying to trick you with edited pics.
I heard that one time, there was a group of students visiting an observatory, and one of the scientists there was giving them a talk. He told them to wait while he went behind the building and threw an object through the air. He asked the kids what sort of object they saw, most saying “disc” or “saucer” or something. The object he threw was a rubber chicken.
My thoughts exactly ^
So, what you’re implying is that humans instinctively project the idea of “alien spacecraft” onto any random visual stimuli in the sky…The question of “why” this is the case is just as interesting to me if not moreso than any “evidence” that appears of specific phenomenon. The question of why incidences are consistently increasing & tend to happen in groups is also interesting, although the answer could be as simple as “there is more flying shit”
^this, bscly.
There’s also the increase in communication and reported incidents, as well as government denial and thus public interest. To illustrate the first point, figures show that crime in South Africa is increasing, though this is not the case. Crime is actually falling, but the percentage of reported incidents is climbing more rapidly. Or something.