…So they fucked up Crysis War’s perfectly fine multiplayer with COD bullshit?
I hope you can opt to play perkless somehow.
Console version looks quite nice, although the staged multiplayer footage makes it look not fun at all.
Still waiting for maxed out PC footage.
No.
Get it?
If not, no.
nothing can beat the graphical realism of crysis 1 with ccc autoexec.cfg set to max
it lags like hell on a GTX280 or Radeon4870, those are the best cards I’ve seen it on.
Heres a new limited edition video 
DDD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEGh8fVGcKw&feature=sub
Edit: Oh, and please help me
I like the hologram, reminds me of duke nukem 3d, but the multiplayer looks like a future cod. At least Crysis Wars/ Crysis 1 mp was unique, power struggle was pretty damn fun and tactical, and the nanosuit and ingame customization of weapons made it so much better. Now we are down to 12 players, and looks like no PS. This is what pisses me off, crytek copies too much.
Far cry 1 - Great game until trigens (mini hell knights from doom 3) come out but still okay.
Crysis - Great game until Aliens come out (the matrix) but alien gameplay dull as shit (warhead fixed this somewhat) - the only cool alien was the hunter that could throw you.
Crysis 2 - Aliens look like a cross between halo/transformers. MP is MW2 in the future essentially (maybe better, maybe worse - need to play it first)
The thing that will make or break crysis 2 for PC - custom level and mod support.
Crysis was hurt by having to download every single fucking map from a site, Crysis Wars it was fixed with an autodownloader but they lost a lot of players already by DROPPING SUPPORT for crysis. Hell, crysis wars should have been a free patch for crysis - although i will say a lot of the new maps were cool, and the game was a lot better overall.
More people play the MECHWARRIOR MOD then the original game. That’s just sad. At least the mapping community is still alive, because the editor is an amazing tool.
I’m not one for graphics, but for crysis - that’s kind of the point (Crysis 1 being fun for the first half was a big surprise to me) Crysis 2 (for PC anyway) i fear will suffer, not because the engine is worse, but because of time constraints and an overall lack of detail. Crytek says that the PC version won’t lose any focus but we’ve yet to see one truly amazing looking picture like we saw with crysis. And the sandbox seems much smaller, more like a series of non-linear areas in levels. Crytek is a pretty good company, but I hope they stay true to their roots and push the boundaries of everything, and not just one platform(I say that because every multiplat ends up looking the same on xbox and ps3 anyway) and forget about the PC.
this is what happens when a game gets developed for consoles
I think it will still be at entertaining. The team is the same, as far as I know.
And besides, multiplayer is dumb. It sounds like they may have really improved the single-player.
Looks that way.
A smart move for Crytek would be to release the specs sometime this year, that way if people get their gaming rigs in advance which will turn into higher sales for Crysis 2 on the pc. Unless they haven’t done so already.
Yeah that really bugs me, they look corny and not very believable. They should take inspiration from Half-Life series instead were aliens look very convincing…
Founded in 2004, Leakfree.org became one of the first online communities dedicated to Valve’s Source engine development. It is more famously known for the formation of Black Mesa: Source under the 'Leakfree Modification Team' handle in September 2004.