Hmmm?
Let me put some equation here, can’t I?
Time equation of relativity said:
It says time can be extended (slower) if v is larger.
So someone may think if v>c the time will go in the opposite direction.
You can try substituting v to be larger than c, so that
it would be fucking complex number! no time travel here, sir.
I guess I really should start using smileys since you guys didn’t understand that it was a joke.
But to be death serious like you guys, I would say that time traveling would be impossible or atleast we wouldn’t notice if it happend.
Let’s say that we had time travel technology and we wanted to travel back a week to change something. As soon as we leave the future that we came from it would dissappear because we already changed the course of time. This leading me into teleportation. It would be impossible because to be able to move something from one place to another in time and space it would need the object(We, a ball, a tree) to dissolve and then send the atomic structure data to the other location and rebuild it. This would probably work for inanimated objects but who know what would happen with a living creature? It may work but it could also end up as a dead body or a disquisting smear on the ground. But this is just my opinion.
OK, we stop there before we get too off topic.
Science isn’t about “Why”, it’s about “Why not?” You ask: Why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: Why not marry safe science if you love it so much? In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won’t hit you on the butt on the way out because YOU ARE FIRED! Not you, test subject. You’re doing fine. You! Yes, you! Box. Your stuff. Door. Parking lot. Goodbye.
Alright, this next test may involve trace amounts of time travel. So, word of advice: If you meet yourself on the next testing track, don’t make eye contact. Lab boys tell me that’ll wipe out time. Entirely. Forward and backward. So, do both of yourselves a favor and let that handsome devil go about his business.
I’m still not sure that anyone involved in the project said the particle is travelling faster than light. It simply has been stated that it arrived sooner than light would have if it travelled the full distance. So it’s the travel time that has been monitored. Not the speed. You can probably get such a result by altering the space travelled through. We know that space can be warped, so isn’t it more likely that space was warped somehow, rather than one of the fundamental laws of nature were broken?
This is the BMS forum. This is no place for joking. Serious business only. :hmph:
One of the most popular explanations right now is that the satellite that the two labs used to sync their clocks didn’t account for relativistic effects; ie, the satellite is in orbit around the Earth, so to it, the two labs appeared to be moving across the surface of the Earth below it.
Revive:
Results have come back from other tests, and it seems that neutrinos can’t go faster than light after all.
awww what a shame
It’s probably for the best. That way scientists don’t waste their time re-writing theories and redoing research.
Awesome, everytime scientists change science, I get the violent shits.
So the guy just resigns when he finds out? ha.
case of ragequit?
My Cat Did It…
[align=center][/align]
News? I heard it was proven to be a hardware malfunction about a month ago.
Yes but the lead scientist quit over the fail. That was new…
Founded in 2004, Leakfree.org became one of the first online communities dedicated to Valve’s Source engine development. It is more famously known for the formation of Black Mesa: Source under the 'Leakfree Modification Team' handle in September 2004.