You laugh you lose

[sersoft]

@Lolipopman

Wait, when did metro become american?

Sorry what? I live in canada and we also have metro with the same exact logo.

[Lolipopman]

Oh, it’s made in sweden, but other countries started publishing it aswell…

[brokenfridgehinge]

Poorly made conspiracy theory websites, always good for a laugh:
https://nstarzone.com/index.html

[bur]

Oh lordy.

@nstarzone

Europe suffers 50 million Muslims already destroying entire countries and their cultures.

Say whaaaaaat?

[DansonDelta40]

[Bolteh]

[wheybags]

@brokenfridgehinge

Poorly made conspiracy theory websites, always good for a laugh:
https://nstarzone.com/index.html

https://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djublonskopf/Flatearthsociety.htm

[brokenfridgehinge]

Wow, really?

[Winged_One]

Once again, picture in your mind a round world. Now imagine that there are two people on this world, one at each pole. For the person at the top of the world, (the North Pole), gravity is pulling him down, towards the South Pole. But for the person at the South Pole, shouldn’t gravity pull him down as well? What keeps our person at the South Pole from falling completely off the face of the “globe”?

Using the “round Earth” theory, setting an object on the earth would be like setting grains of sand on a beach ball. Certainly a few grains would stay - right around the top, the surface is nearly horizontal - but when you stray too far from the absolute top of the ball, the grains of sand start sliding off and falling onto the ground. The Earth, if round, should behave in exactly the same fashion. Because the top is a very localized region on a sphere, if the Earth were in fact round, there would be only a very small area of land that would be at all inhabitable. Stray to the outside fringes of the “safe zone”, and you start walking at a tilt. The further out you go, the more you slant, until your very survival is determined by the tread on your boots. Reach a certain point, and you slide off the face of the planet entirely. Obviously, something is wrong.

Now imagine, if only for the sake of argument, that the person on top and the person on bottom can both manage to remain attracted to the ground “below” them. What would happen if the person on one side decided to visit the other? Since the man at the North Pole has a different idea of what is down and up (and in fact experiences an opposite pull from the Earth’s gravity) than the person at the South Pole does, when the denizen of the frozen Arctic visits his Antarctic counterpart, they will experience gravitational pulls exactly opposite of each other! The human from the North Pole will “fall up”, never returning to the ground, and will continue falling forever into the deep void of outer space!

Holy shit, that better be satire.

[wheybags]

I even saw one of their forumites somewhere suggest that 9/11 was an inside job pulled because too many people were wondering why the earth looked so flat from up there.

[DansonDelta40]

Holy shit, that better be satire.

Exactly what I thought when reading the Old Testament.

[bur]

hahaha what? Those are the worst arguments I have read for a flat earth ever.

[func_random]

@brokenfridgehinge

Poorly made conspiracy theory websites, always good for a laugh:
https://nstarzone.com/index.html

Geocities is not gone after all!

[Winged_One]

At least that other website had some science and calculations (twisted to their side, but still).

[func_random]

[Bolteh]

Hah at the last one.

[Paddy]

lol’d at the SS one.

[wolfer]

https://www.thesneeze.com/steve-dont-eat-it/

Pretty disgusting, but good reading nonetheless.

[Kairouseki]

I lost on the SS one too.

[Omega_Absolute]

Haven’t seen it on here but crucify me if I’m wrong…