Straight vs LGBT(Lesbian, Gay, Bi, Transexual)

What, only saying “I just love gay people, they are awesome” counts as opinion and only that’s beneficial? Tell me now, how is that right? Oh and my last posts are not filled with mature language and stuff (since i got an infraction) so you just dont have the right to ask me to leave untill I start speaking filthy again.

Edit: but anyway, keep saying im ignorant and immature, I dont care, I hate them and always will, You’ll never convince me neither will I you. I don’t want to get banned so I wont come back to this thread. Be happy with your epic thoughts and stuff…bye

Look at that, it worked. He left.

Hypnotek is credit to team.

If only more people were so enlightened.

Aze you are out of line with your choice of words in your post and you know it. Your verbal diarrhea is being noted and one day it will just be too much. You may find yourself banned.

Better than becoming such a sad, embarrassing example of morality failure as Aze.

The group leading this protest is small and radical. I doubt that thousands would actually show. The website I’ve linked it back to is some sort of weird, transgenderism-will-rule-all affair.

Also, you’re a homophobic, probably closeted self-hating gay man. Enjoy a lifetime of ignorance, dissatisfaction and fear.

“Support” isn’t the word for me.
“Don’t give a shit” is more like it. If you’re gay, fine with me. You’re no less of a human being in my book.

Oh, and Aze, fuck off.

And now that he has gotten his daily spank we could probably move on with the topic.

And I like your thinking JohnKiller. I wouldnt say I “dont give a shit” but it is probably more of a “I got TONS of my own problems to worry about rather than get on your back for a lifestyle I do not approve of”.

Going back to the topic, the question is asking my preference. That would be a heterosexual world. But I recognize this is wholly unrealistic of which does not give me the right to be an angry santa.

“Don’t give a shit” was an intentional exaggeration in order to give the reader a sense of how badass and awesome I am.

Too bad I’m neither badass or awesome. :frowning:

I don’t know - I think I am actually kinda glad that the number of homosexual people is (or at least seems to be) rising. Helps at least a little bit in lowering the breeding rate of this Earth-sickening virus called humanity.

Oh, and (please don’t get angry at me for this) “lifestyle” is not really the appropriate word for a biologically pre-programmed sexual preference. “Lifestyle” again implies that one has a choice, which is not at all the case. Nit-picking maybe, but as the ex-fiance of a bisexual woman who worked in a coming-out center I am kind of sensitive to things like that.

Not meaning to offend by sounding like a smartass - which I probably do, so sorry for that. Just pointing it out, that’s all.

In showing such an amount of self-criticism you have just gotten much closer to actually become it. (Or maybe you were just fishing for compliments.)

Why thank you obelisk, I try.

And Johnkiller, don’t worry, we love you even if you aren’t a badass. You will be someday.

life⋅style [lahyf-stahyl]

–noun
the habits, attitudes, tastes, moral standards, economic level, etc., that together constitute the mode of living of an individual or group.

I dont think my choice of word was off. But meh.

are all things that an individual can willingly change, unlike it’s predefined sexual orientation. I agree that there might be such a thing as a gay “lifestyle”, but that is something different to their actual sexuality - connected to it of course, but still something different.

I’d like to point out that most of the anti-gay posters have simply brought up ‘issues’ with gay people that aren’t exclusive to gays: douchiness being a prime example. Sure there are douche gays, but for every one of them, there’s a hundred douche straight people. Why so steep? Cuz there’s that many more straight people.

Oh, and I’ve been toying around with this thought, thinking bout posting it this entire thread, and now that somebody has said it, I will restate it. With higher acceptance of gays (which hopefully really IS on the rise), means more gays won’t force themselves to act straight, and the population growth would slow, not by much, but probably over a few decades enough to show some effects, such as a slight lessening of unemployment and other such things.

About gayness being a life-style, it kind of is, but it’s forced upon them, and they CAN fight it, but with serious mental-health risks. It falls under the category of habits, attitudes, tastes, and moral standards (not in a bad way, just that gays usually aren’t anti-gays, unless it wasn’t already apparent!). Oh, and if I don’t like pancakes (which I do like) today, I can’t really change that. I know that’s taking taste at the lowest literal level, but it was the best example I could shoot off the top of my head.

Just curious, but why don’t you approve?

I am sure Catz didn’t mean it that way. How could she disapprove of people living the way they are predefined to live?

That would be like forcing left-handed people to use their right hand instead - look here for the more harmless effects.

Or here for the general topic.

Look here for possible effects of gays leading a straight lie/life

Facts about closeted homosexuals

Facts about Homophobia

MY lifestyle consists of using my computer, my job, schooling, the works.

None of it would change if I had a different sexual preference. Being gay doesn’t change anything besides just your sexual preference.

I welcome your intolerance, it’s your opinion and here is the designated place to debate and better those opinions.

Pro-tip: You don’t fight fire with fire guys, being a douche to Aze won’t change his opinion only strengthen it.

I still can’t understand for the life of me how anyone can think homosexuality is a choice. Homosexuals have, for a severe lack of a better term, a mental and hormonal defect which makes them attracted to the same sex. They don’t do it on purpose to be rebels and fuck with the heterosexuals. It’s not a preference, either. It’s how they were born. As such, it’s almost silly for the church and other homophobic slanderers say it’s “unnatural” and “immoral”. “They should be heterosexual!” they say. Uh-huh. Try telling a man who was born with no feeling below his waist to get out of his wheelchair. Cause, based on that logic, he, too, is obviously choosing to degrade the nerves in his spine and really just wants to fuck up the family hikes and trips to that Vermont water park everyone enjoys but him. The reaction would be astounding.

So, before anyone says anything, yes I am implying that homosexual individuals have a disability. But the difference between him and his wheelchair-bound brother is that he is fully functioning. We give equal rights to those who are paralyzed, why not to that dude who just happens to be attracted to men. Even more so, considering he can walk, jump, swim, drive, etc. And if you allow yourself to be negatively influenced by him because of his sexual “preference,” you are basically doing it wrong. Try to imagine a world where we had such strong feelings against paralysis victims. Difficult to do so, ain’t it?

So, to sum up, yes, homosexuals are not choosing to be gay, but should be respected just the same as any straight person.

I agree with all your point except the one about homosexual people having defects. Not sure how you came to that conclusion.

I have no problems with gays, lesbians, bis, transexuals, as long as they’re not all in your face about it.

If there’s one thing that gets to me, it’s gays (I’ll just use this as a groupname for those mentioned above) frolicking around, joining “I’m gay and I’m proud!” or “Young, but not straight” groups and screaming for more rights and special treatments because they’re gay while they’re walking around the streets wearing leather g-strings. These kind of gays are as annoying and narrowminded as racists and anti-gay-people (like those people wanting to protest against Avatar).

Then again, I don’t give a shit about anyone, as long as they don’t annoy me.

Founded in 2004, Leakfree.org became one of the first online communities dedicated to Valve’s Source engine development. It is more famously known for the formation of Black Mesa: Source under the 'Leakfree Modification Team' handle in September 2004.