Why on earth didn’t you take pics? I would’ve
Too busy trying to dry the drivers seat instead.
haahaha
My car weighs twice as much and its tires are twice as old… how come I’ve never had a blowout? 
I feel like I should go through with at least one, for the sake of experience handling it.
25" is big?
Hah!
I’m happy with 22".
I have a 19". I’m looking to upgrade to a slightly bigger, widescreen monitor. Somewhere in the 1680x1050 resolution area.
tbh I’m glad I don’t have a monitor that huge. My 9800 GT would commit suicide at the thought of running games at that big a resolution.
Ditto.
I’m happy with my 8".
Why you guys need to elongate your manhood is beyond me.
mines 42", but its a hdtv, so it doesnt count right?
Nope, due to the fact is no doubt has horrid response time, and since its HDTV, its at 1920x1080 and no doubt looks horrible.
I’m going to buy a cheap linux umpc with a 4.8" touchscreen, format and install WinXP \o/
my tv is as tall as i am
considering i’m hardly over 5 feet tall its not that impressive but still motherfucker
Resolution: 1920 x 1080p
Response Time (G to G) 5 ms
Brightness (cd/m2): 500
Through HDMI.
1920x1080 on a 42" screen = huge pixels
great for a TV, horrible for a PC monitor
that and the fact that you waste the energy needed to keep your tv on just to use the computer is pretty laughable
Mine’s 2048x1152 on a 23" screen… lemme do some math… 8)
seeing as the measure is the length of the diagonal, and the aspect ratio is identical, the resolutions and screen sizes can be compared on the first order…INDENT / (23/2048) = 1.94782609[/INDENT]considering this only covers the horizontal pixel density improvement, we can square it and find the reciprocal to get the size of my pixels…INDENT^2 / (42/1920)^2 = 1950105600 / 7398752256 = 13225/50176 = 26% of “huge pixels”[/INDENT]
Soooo is 26% of “huge” good? B)
Distance. It depends on it
